National Honor Society Narrative Essay Samples

An exploration of the nature of decision-making in Chaucers Troilus and Criseyde - Literature Essay Samples

In Troilus and Criseyde, Chaucer presents decision-making in a variety of ways, including through the relationship between fate, knowledge and freedom of action, ideas that are at the centre of medieval philosophy. Troilus claims to not believe in total free will, but rather a passive free will of succumbing to his own death wish, whilst both Troilus and Criseyde are seen to curse the gods throughout the poem for affecting their lives so badly, essentially replacing any sense of free will with fate and dooming them to be tragic lovers. Chaucer presents Troilus’ decision-making as particularly flawed in that it is relative to himself alone; Troilus attempts to prove how necessary it is to love Criseyde with very little logic, using instead a decision-making process that is encompassed entirely in his own imagination. Troilus states that love must exist as it is possible to imagine it, making him question his decision of love to the very core of his beliefs. In contrast, Criseyd e values rational processes of thought and her own free will, making intelligent and informed decisions. This makes it far more intriguing when Chaucer explores Criseyde’s internal dialogue of thoughts than Troilus’. This is shown in the following quotation: ‘Allas! Syn I am free,/Sholde I now love, and put in jupartie/ My sikernesse, and thrallen libertee?/ Allas how dorst I thenken that folie?/ May I naught wel other folk aspie/ Hire dredfull joye, hir constreinte, and hire peyne?’[1] (Book II, 771-776) The particular interest for the reader in these internal dialogues lies in the knowledge that Criseyde’s conscious decision to love Troilus could potentially remove her freedom of thought; the ‘dredfull joye’ of other people is not dissimilar to her own feeling of apprehension when she first learns that Troilus has chosen to love her. However, it is important to note here that the initial introduction between Troilus and Criseyde was m erely a meeting set up between two friends. With this in mind, it is plausible that the decision to love on Troilus’ part was perhaps a marginally calculating one, as befriending a person was sometimes used as a strategy to form unions amongst those in court and to better one’s own social standing. Troilus decides to view Criseyde first and foremost as a friend, secondly as a lover: ‘hire love of friendship have I to the wonne/ and also hath she leyd hire feyth to borwe’[2] (Book II, 962-963). A totally different style of decision-making can be seen with Pandarus, whom Chaucer displays as competent yet still very human and accessible to the reader. Pandarus adopts the role of an unrequited lover, making him appear instantly less indecisive than a person unsure of their romantic intentions. However, Pandarus’ irrational level of reasoning should not be overlooked; this is used in order to coerce Troilus into telling Pandarus his most closely guarded secret: the fact that he loves Criseyde. This shows that Pandarus has a tendency to act in an illogical fashion. The sheer tenacity of this is shown in his decision to continue pushing Troilus until he receives an answer, resorting to physically shaking him for a response: ‘And with that word he gan hym for to shake,/And seyde, â€Å"Thef/thow shalt hyre name telle†/’[3] (Book 2, 36-38). Troilus is understandably frightened by these actions, prompting Pandarus to become yet more irrational in his choic e of actions, choosing to seek the help of his niece to help Troilus, a less than logical decision. Whilst Pandarus is not in the least practical in his decision-making, he does have a tendency to oversimplify problems and not empathize fully with other characters, making him seem emotionally detached. In the process of decision-making itself, instead of coming to a rapid conclusion concerning his actions as Troilus might, he offers verbal summaries of situations, unfailingly lacking in a final solution. This is evident in his response to Troilus’ grief at losing Criseyde; he quotes ‘newe love out chaceth ofte the olde’[4] (Book 4, 414). This reading of Zanzis is highly ironic and once again shows the flaws in Pandarus’ decision-making, as it was this same effect that ‘newe love’ has on the old that leads Criseyde to tragedy in the first instance. Pandarus’ limitations become very visible to the reader here, in that he has no capability for positive or comforting response, only the ability to make decisions of retrospect, in the hope that Troilus may take from it a little short-lived happiness. It is also significant to note that whilst Pandarus’ ability to make informed decisions becomes gradually more limited, Chaucer chooses to display the opposing style in the narrative voice. The tone becomes detached and progressively more expansive from this point onwards, eventually becoming a detached voice able to comment objectively from the point of view of an outsider. The final decision-making technique to be explored is on the part of Chaucer himself, and his conditioning of our responses to relationships in ‘Troilus and Criseyde’ throughout the text, often in order to achieve a comedic effect. An example of this is the structure of Book V. This is the point at which Chaucer chooses to give the reader significantly superior knowledge to Pandarus, undermining his authority in a comical fashion and distancing the narrator from him. When Troilus interpretation of his dream as symbolizing Criseyde’s unfaithfulness to him is dismissed by Pandarus, Chaucer subtly manipulates the reader to know that the dream was actually prescient. This further enhances the distance between the omniscient narrator and Pandarus, who is desperately in need of control and freedom of thought whilst those are the two things he ultimately lacks. Chaucer’s careful decision to shape the text in this way allows certain ironies to take place, but is in consistent with the narrative voice that changes between ideas so rapidly, reflecting both the illogical decision-making technique of his main characters and Troilus’ never-ending introspective nature.

Topic About Spanish Conquest of Aztec

Topic About Spanish Conquest of AztecIf you want to write a proper essay on a historical topic about Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire, then it is the right time to do so. There are lots of people who know about this subject but are not familiar with the main books that can guide them in writing an essay. In fact, they have the idea that the topic itself will not be the main reason why people will pay attention to the assignment given to them. Thus, they are not able to make their own sentence complex enough to discuss the subject well.As a matter of fact, the main reason why one will have to write a topic about historical topic is the opportunity provided by the high quality books that are available in the market. Before starting your assignment on the Spanish conquest of Aztec, it is important for you to start your search in books and other resources that can help you in creating a decent topic. Otherwise, the result that you are going to get will be a failed assignment.Historic al topic about Spanish conquest of Aztec is a book that provides a thorough knowledge about the cultural aspects and its people. It has even prepared some articles that are dedicated to the topic. So if you really want to prepare a good topic, you should firstly start your research in the market. After all, you can not expect the same results from people who fail to get the required information from the books available in the market.In the market, you will find many books that have been prepared on Spanish conquest of Aztec. Most of these books are prepared by highly qualified scholars who have a deep knowledge about the topic. Their aim is to offer reliable and accurate information that is required for the topic. So you can not only focus on the content but also the way in which the information is presented.The book that provides proper knowledge about the Spanish conquest of Aztec will be a valuable resource for you if you want to write a good and precise essay. However, it will b e very hard for you to choose one book. You should remember that there are some books that are prepared by very qualified scholars while there are some that are prepared by simple people with less knowledge about the topic.Essays that are written in the market will only give you a general outline on the topic. While, if you want to write an essay with detailed information about the subject, then it is better for you to write essays by professionals. It is because there are some scholars who are interested in producing better results by offering professional assistance in writing an essay.The best thing about writing an essay on the Spanish conquest of Aztec is that it can give you more quality results than that of any other essay in the market. As a matter of fact, you will be able to reach high grades when you write a great and captivating essay. Furthermore, you will also be able to improve your writing skills.There are lots of useful resources for you in getting a topic about the Spanish conquest of Aztec. The main thing is that you should not just rely on the books but should rather utilize the information that can help you write a good and comprehensive essay.